Transformation of Nora in Henrik Isbens A Dolls House Essay -- Henri

Transformation of Nora in Henrik Isbens A Dolls mobDuring the time in which Henrik Isbens play, A Doll?s House, took place society frowned upon women asserting themselves. Women were sibylline to play a role in which they supported their husbands, took care of their children, and do sure e verything was perfect around the house. Nora is portrayed as a snort throughout the play until she realizes the truth about the realism she lives in, and cuts herself free. Nora Helmer was a clear character that had been pampered wholly of her life, by her father, and by Torvald. She in reality didnt have a care in the world. She didnt even have to care for the children the maid would usually take care of that. In every sense of the word, she was your typical housewife. Nora neer left the house, mostly because her husband was afraid of the way people would talk. It really wasnt her fault she was the way she was it was mostly Torvalds for spoiling her. Nora relies on Torvald for everything , from movements to thoughts, much analogous a puppet that is dependent on its puppet master for all of its actions. Her carefree spirit and somewhat childish manners are shown throughout the play with statements such as, Is that my petty(a) lark twittering out there? (1). Is it my little squirrel bustling about? (2). A lark is a happy, carefree bird, and a squirrel is quite the opposite. If you are to squirrel away something, you were hiding or storing it, kind of ilk what Nora was doing with her bag of macaroons. It seems childish that Nora must hide things such as macaroons from her husband, hardly if she didnt and he found out, she would be deceiving him and freeing against his wishes which would be socially impose on _or_ oppress. As the play goes on, Nora seems to transform from her delicate little character into something much to a greater extent. At the end of act one, Krogstad goes to Nora for the recollection of the money she had borrowed from him. You don?t recall that you will tell my husband that I owe you money? (21). Since Nora was wrong in doing so socially, she could non tell Torvald or anyone else about her problem. non only would that affect their social standard but also Torvalds ego, which needfully would happen anyway. After Krogstad threatens to expose Nora for forging her fathers signature, she realizes that no matter what she does Torvald was going to know the truth. The flaw with... ...ying in a marriage since divorce was frowned upon during that era. Her ratiocination was a succession for all expectations put on a charr and wife by society. The story A Doll?s House is believable. It stands for every marriage where equality never took place. Many women knew their social term and lived as they were meant to, but for the few that realized there was more to the world then the sheltered life they were living, broke free. Nora was one of the women who knew her place and acted hence until she saw that her name had no real va lue. She was not looked at as an individual, but she was seen as her fathers daughter or her husbands wife. The turning point for her decision to break free from this world and start her own life is very believable. She comes to see that her marriage isnt real. Nora no longer loves her husband and knows that he does not truly love her as well. She knows that there is so much more to discover in the world to understand, and until she does she will not allow some other man to control her life.Works CitedIbsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. In Four major(ip) Plays. Trans. James McFarlane and Jens Arup. Oxford Oxford University Press, 1981.