justification for higher education Essay -- essays research papers

Justification For Higher EducationAfter analyzing William A. hydrogen iii s In Defense of Elitism and Caroline madam sCollege is a Waste of Time and Money , it is clear that Henry s assertion concerning thepurpose of an gentilityal activity is more rational than Bird s delinquent to the fact that Henry supports his claimswith credible statistics, logical insight, and uses current real instauration scenarios. Bird, on thecontrary, bases her argument solely on manipulated statistics, overly dramatic claims, andludicrously out-of-this-world scenarios.While there are various viewpoints and perspectives on the subject of high education,Henry for one, has landed the conclusion that in America high education for the masses has notonly been extremely costly economically, but it has similarly greatly lowered the educational warningsand therefore defeated the purpose of higher education itself.Henry s primary grievance against higher education for the masses is that the influx ofme diocrities relentlessly lowers the general standards at colleges to levels the weak ones suffermeet (335). Quite simply, higher education is by no meaning any higher if the standards keeplowering just so several(prenominal) students chiffonier barely meet the minimum standards. For physical exertion, although Iam a full supporter of the bell curve in college, it is certain(prenominal) that this new-fangled innovation has had itsshare in lowering the university s educational standards. This physical exercise of calculating the studentsaverage score on an exam and then re-scaling grades to assistant those who didn t fare as well is aclear example of bringing the standard of college down to everyone s level (336). I can certainlyattest to this claim because I was recently directly affect by the bell curve. In the first quarter ofmy freshman year, I received a score of 44 out of a contingent 100 points on my Physics 7A finalexam. According to the general 10% increment grading scale, this would mean that I earned an Fon the exam. However, thanks to the mediocrities earning even lower scores than myself andthe establishment of the bell curve, I fared quite nicely and escaped with a B- grade. Although thisis definitely good password for me, Henry s claim that the mediocrities tend to lower the educationalstandard seems to prevail.The influx of mediocrities flooding college campuses has also lowered the credibility andstatus of a college degree.... ...re noguarantees in these professions either (329).After dissecting her claims and supporting statements, it is clear that Bird is trying toundermine the value of a college degree. Tying this into her previous claims, we must(prenominal) ask sincewhen is anything in life guaranteed? If we consider her implication that some students should check vocational education, well then it is obvious that there are no guarantees in jobs of thatnature either. It is troubling to see that Bird simply dismisses certain jobs just because there iscompetition for them or because she thinks colleges fail to warn students of the competition.William Henry and Caroline Bird both have sharply different approaches in regards tomaking there arguments about the purpose of an education. Although they share common grungeon various issues, the two become divided due to the types of examples and exhibit they use tosupport their claims. After careful analysis, it is clear that Henry s line of reasoning and concreteevidence tops that of Bird s due to his logical insight. Unfortunately for Bird, she is simply leftscrambling in the colored in search of bogus evidence in an attempt to ease her claims.