.

Thursday, February 7, 2019

People Accused Of Violent Crimes Should Not Be Allowed To Post Bail :: essays research papers

People Accused of Violent Crimes Should Not Be Allowed To Post BailPeople impeach of violent crimes should not be whollyowed to post unloose andremain out of jail while their exertion is pending. There are many reasons to whyI powerfully contain with this statement. Many factors are unknown to the publicwithout conducting some sort of panoptic research. Whether it is simplyreading in the paper about pending trials, or as complicated as researchingprevious trials. Bail is obdurate by a judge, and their lives are devoted tohandling these types of decisions. There are triplet solid reasons to why I feelit is necessary to deny shackle to those accused of violent crimes. One is thatall conditions for release are decided by a judge who is fully aware of the deal. Another is that these defendants, since organism arrested, shouldbe considered a threat to public safety. My last, and final, reason is that myrationale strongly agrees with denial of bail to the accused.In Nebraska, as written in the Statutes of Nebraska, bail is grantedafter a judge takes into account the nature and circumstances of the offensecharged. This judge looks at the defendants family ties, employment, financialresources, character and mentality, having resided in the community, faithrecords, and record of court appearances or of flight to avoid prosecution orfailure to appear. A judge, when deciding if bail is to be granted, does not unspoilt flip a coin to decide. He or she looks at all aspects of the situation.It all rests in the judges hands. When a judge looks at a soul accused of aviolent crime, such as murder, a fewer things are liable to pop into perspective.One would be to how violent and harmful the accusations are. Any rationalthinking person would adopt that if arrested, they are in suspicion.Therefore, a state appointed judge is also going to realize that this personmust be a threat, especially if accused of a violent crime. It does not violatethe accused rights, becau se once under arrest, their rights are strictly definedas what the judges final decision is.This leads me to my next point, that these accused people are a threat.The purpose of bail, as defined by the Nebraska Statute, is to ensure that thedefendant will show at the trial. I researched a case where this was stronglyconsidered. Brian Mase is accused of shooting and killing sewer Boyer, afterBoyer refused to leave Mases home. They were in a fight over a stolen watch.

No comments:

Post a Comment