12 Angery Men :: essays research papers

The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen twelvemonth old boy from the ghetto who is on mental testing for the murder of his abusive father. A gore of twelve men argon locked in the deliberation board to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The taste informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would non entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty. Even forrader the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. However, when the initial poll is taken Juror 8 (Henry Fonda) registers a shocking not guilty vote. Immediately the room is in uproar. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hurriedly decide to humor the juror 8 (Henry Fonda) by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Eventually, as the talks proceed juror 8 easy under mines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely easy to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. Gradually they are won all over by his arguments and unconstipated the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitatingly agrees with him. Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at a unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other. What expectms to be a decisive guilty verdict as deliberations begin lento becomes a questionable not sure. Although the movie deals with issues relating to the process of effective dialogue this paper will focus of two reasons why they encounter difficulties and how they quash them. First, we will apply the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation. Then, we will see how each individuals frame of reference and prejudices effect their perception which cause difficulties in the communication process. If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men. draw into consideration, referred to by juror numbers only they do not even have the benefit of knowing their names. These men have never talked before. separately of them come from different situations with